Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse
Call 317-269-2500 For A Consultation
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Firm History
    • Firm News
    • Career Opportunities
      • Attorneys
      • Law Students
      • Professional Staff
    • Helpful Links
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Appeals
    • Business Organizations
    • Education
    • Estate Planning & Probate
    • Governmental Affairs
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Policyholder & Insurance Recovery
    • Real Estate & Land Use
    • Utilities Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Payment Portal
    • Pay Invoice
    • Pay Retainer
Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Firm History
    • Firm News
    • Career Opportunities
      • Attorneys
      • Law Students
      • Professional Staff
    • Helpful Links
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Appeals
    • Business Organizations
    • Education
    • Estate Planning & Probate
    • Governmental Affairs
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Policyholder & Insurance Recovery
    • Real Estate & Land Use
    • Utilities Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Payment Portal
    • Pay Invoice
    • Pay Retainer
Email

CALL

Experienced Litigators And Advocates Serving Clients Across Indiana

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. Utility Law
  4.  ► 
  5. Drilling Down on Termination Clauses in Oils and Gas Leases L.C. Neely Drilling, Inc. v. Hoosier Energy Rural Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 8 N.E.3d 251 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014)

Drilling Down on Termination Clauses in Oils and Gas Leases L.C. Neely Drilling, Inc. v. Hoosier Energy Rural Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 8 N.E.3d 251 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014)

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Oct 7, 2014 | Utility Law |

The Indiana Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion explaining the difference between two common types of termination clauses in oils and gas leases. The first, known as a “drill or pay” clause, obliges the lessee to either commence production within a certain timeframe or pay advance royalties, but does not operate to automatically terminate the lease in the event of a breach. The second, called an “unless” clause, provides that the lease will automatically terminate if the conditions are not met.

In this case, an oil and gas lease was amended to include a provision requiring payment of advance royalties be made within a certain timeframe if neither actual production nor shut-in gas royalties were being paid (the “Advance Royalties Clause”). The operative effect of this provision was to permit the lessee to renew the lease from year-to-year by timely paying advance royalties in the proper amount. When that amendment was made, there was no change to the demand clause which stated that the lease would terminate upon the occurrence of certain conditions (“Demand Clause”). One of the conditions was the nonpayment of any amount due within ten days following a demand for payment. However, the Demand Clause made reference to “other termination provisions.”

The court explains that the lessor did not need to make a demand to the lessee because the Advance Royalty Clause was another termination provision within the lease and was one of the “other termination provisions” referenced in Demand Clause. When the lessee failed to timely pay the proper amount of advance royalties, the effect was an expiration of the lease by operation of its terms rather than by an action of the parties to the lease. The court determined that the terms of the contract were clear and there was no need to resort to extrinsic evidence. The outcome of this case reinforces that courts will give effect to the parties’ intent and will interpret oil and gas leases according to the plain meanings of their terms.

Jeremy Fetty is a partner in the law firm of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse with offices in Lebanon and Indianapolis. He often advises businesses and utilities (for profit, non-profit and cooperative) on organizational, human resources, and transactional matters and drafts and reviews commercial contracts.

The statements contained herein are matters of opinion and general information only and are not to be considered legal advice and should not be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. If you have any questions regarding this article, please contact an attorney.

Recent Posts

  • Indiana Appeals Court Affirms Bad-Faith Claim Against Erie Insurance
  • What If Evidence Is Destroyed In A Lawsuit?
  • The Number Of Remonstrators Controls Opposition To Establishemnt Of A Conservancy District
  • Local Government Need Not Provide Health Insurance to Elected Official
  • FERC Legal – Blog Post: Duke Energy Corp. v. FERC, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 16108

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Our Office To Learn How We Can Serve You

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse

Phone:
317-269-2500

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Phone: 317-269-2500
Fax: 317-269-2514
Toll Free: 888-337-7766

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052


Phone:
765-482-0110
Phone: 317-269-2509
Fax: 765-483-3444
Toll Free: 888-532-7766

Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601

Phone: 312-724-8280
Fax: 773-960-8600

Review The Firm
Pay Invoice
Pay Retainer
Schedule Payment

© 2026 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw