Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse
Call 317-269-2500 For A Consultation
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Firm History
    • Firm News
    • Career Opportunities
      • Attorneys
      • Law Students
      • Professional Staff
    • Helpful Links
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Appeals
    • Business Organizations
    • Education
    • Estate Planning & Probate
    • Governmental Affairs
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Policyholder & Insurance Recovery
    • Real Estate & Land Use
    • Utilities Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Payment Portal
    • Pay Invoice
    • Pay Retainer
Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Firm History
    • Firm News
    • Career Opportunities
      • Attorneys
      • Law Students
      • Professional Staff
    • Helpful Links
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Appeals
    • Business Organizations
    • Education
    • Estate Planning & Probate
    • Governmental Affairs
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Policyholder & Insurance Recovery
    • Real Estate & Land Use
    • Utilities Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Payment Portal
    • Pay Invoice
    • Pay Retainer
Email

CALL

Experienced Litigators And Advocates Serving Clients Across Indiana

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. Blog

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP Legal Blog

Indiana Appeals Court Affirms Bad-Faith Claim Against Erie Insurance

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 18, 2026 | Insurance

Appellate Court Affirms Bad-Faith Claim When Erie Insurance Opportunistically Avoided Paying the Uninsured Motorist claim and Court Declared UM/UIM Coverage Limits Do Not Apply to the Breach of Policy Damages Claims The Indiana Court of Appeals largely affirmed the...

What If Evidence Is Destroyed In A Lawsuit?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 25, 2026 | Parr Richey

Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court dealt with the issue to handle potential evidence which is not preserved and the Court declared that the issue is within the discretion of the trial court.  The case involved a person who was injured when she tripped on a lobby...

The Number Of Remonstrators Controls Opposition To Establishemnt Of A Conservancy District

by James Buddenbaum | Feb 25, 2026 | Firm News

Numerous freeholders petitioned the trial court to establish the Lake of the Woods of Marshall County Conservancy District which was met with remonstrators who sought dismissal. The trial court dismissed the petition after finding the remonstrators met statutory...

Local Government Need Not Provide Health Insurance to Elected Official

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Aug 19, 2025 | Cases

The Indiana Supreme Court has held that the local government was within its rights to classify a county council member as a part-time employee and exclude him from group health insurance coverage. The court found that Indiana law allows local governmental units to...

FERC Legal – Blog Post: Duke Energy Corp. v. FERC, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 16108

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Aug 19, 2025 | Cases

In January 2014, a so-called “Polar Vortex” caused a significant increase in the demand for electricity and a corresponding spike in the price of natural gas. To make matters worse, a Canadian natural gas pipeline burst on January 25, 2014. This was a major problem...

FERC Legal – Old Dominion Elec. Coop. v. FERC, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 16105

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Aug 19, 2025 | Cases

I. Introduction and Case Summary   In January 2014, a so-called “Polar Vortex” scourged the Eastern United States, causing a significant amount of property damage and several fatalities. While many industries were impacted by the Polar Vortex, electrical utilities...

Indiana Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Owed in Takings Relating to Road Construction

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Nov 19, 2024 | Real Estate

In October 2024, the Indiana Supreme Court held that property owners cannot recover damages for traffic flow reduction to their property caused by roadway projects if the project leaves the property’s access points unchanged because no taking of a property right would occur.[1] As part of new I-69 construction, the state in 2019 sought to purchase a narrow strip of…

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Investigation of Public Utility Status of DER Aggregators

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 7, 2024 | Utility Law

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has initiated an investigation to determine whether distributed energy resource (“DER”) aggregators are “public utilities” under Indiana law.[1] FERC Order 2222 gave DERs the right to participate in wholesale energy markets through aggregators and required regional transmission organizations such as MISO and PJM to file tariff changes to facilitate participation by DER aggregators. Over the…

The Role of Engineers in Insurance Claims

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Dec 26, 2023 | American Structurepoint, Bad Faith, Claims, Damages, Donan Engineering, Engineers, hail damage, homeowner's insurance, Insurance, investing, Nederveld, Policy Interpretation, Property Damage, renters-insurance, Storm damage, wind damage

Increasingly, insurance companies are denying claims for loss and damage to homes and commercial structures on the basis of reports obtained from engineers during the course of adjusting the claim. In a typical scenario, a homeowner discovers that their roof has been damaged by a storm and reports a claim to their insurance company. The insurance company may send one…

Indiana Utility Law – Ind. Office of Utility Consumer Counselor v. Duke Energy Indiana, LLC, 21A-EX-2702 (Ind. Ct. App. 2023)

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jul 10, 2023 | Utility Law

On February 21, 2023, the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed an Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) order granting Duke Energy Indiana (“Duke”) recovery of costs pursuant to federal Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) rules for treating coal ash and remediating ash ponds because the Commission had not yet approved the project, which constituted impermissible retroactive ratemaking. The central issue before the…

« Older Entries

Recent Posts

  • Indiana Appeals Court Affirms Bad-Faith Claim Against Erie Insurance
  • What If Evidence Is Destroyed In A Lawsuit?
  • The Number Of Remonstrators Controls Opposition To Establishemnt Of A Conservancy District
  • Local Government Need Not Provide Health Insurance to Elected Official
  • FERC Legal – Blog Post: Duke Energy Corp. v. FERC, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 16108

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Our Office To Learn How We Can Serve You

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse

Phone:
317-269-2500

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Phone: 317-269-2500
Fax: 317-269-2514
Toll Free: 888-337-7766

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052


Phone:
765-482-0110
Phone: 317-269-2509
Fax: 765-483-3444
Toll Free: 888-532-7766

Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601

Phone: 312-724-8280
Fax: 773-960-8600

Review The Firm
Pay Invoice
Pay Retainer
Schedule Payment

© 2026 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw